 |
MOLBA03 - Oral Abstract Session
HIV-1 female-to-male sexual transmission: evaluation of circumcised and uncircumcised penile tissue
Presented by Minh Dinh (United States).
M. Dinh1, M. Anderson1, C. Gioia1, M. McRaven1, Z. Okocha1, G. Cianci1, T. Hirbod2, G. Kigozi3, J. Prodger4, R. Kaul4, X. Kong5, R. Gray5, T. Hope1
1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Cell and Molecular Biology, Chicago, United States, 2Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Rakai Health Sciences Program, Entebbe, Uganda, 4University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 5Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
Background: Male circumcision has been
shown to decrease rates of HIV acquisition in African men. The STEP vaccine
trial also demonstrated that vaccinated, uncircumcised men were at increased
risk for HIV acquisition. We sought to identify the mode(s) by which HIV infection
may occur in uncircumcised men. Methods: Foreskins were obtained from
consenting male donors receiving prophylactic male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. Whole penile specimens were obtained
from tissue donation organizations (ScienceCare and NDRI). Using fluorescent
immunohistochemistry, foreskin keratin layers were labeled with filaggrin and
involucrin markers. Penile tissues were incubated with ex vivo with photo-activatable
GFP-linked-Vpr HIVBal for 4 hours, snap-frozen, and
cryosections stained for target cells and keratin. Images were obtained with
epifluorescent microscopy and analyzed for keratin thickness, viral particles, and
viral penetration into penile epithelia. Results: We found no significant
differences between inner and outer foreskin keratin layers from 19 foreskin
samples obtained in Uganda, indicating that reduced keratin thickness is not likely to make the
inner foreskin more susceptible to HIV. Preliminary
data from whole penile specimens (uncircumcised n=7, circumcised
n=7) shows no significant difference in number of visualized virions per
image captured, but more virions entering uncircumcised as compared to circumcised glans tissue (uncircumcised:circumcised
= 2:1). Virions were found at distances from the epithelial surface (mean ± SD
= 33.5 ± 22.3 µm) in the range where CD4+ cells are also localized (mean ± SD =
53.6 ±32.3 µm), in the absence of trauma to the epithelium. Finally, we visualize
virions interacting with the male urethral pseudo-stratified columnar epithelia,
though to a lesser degree than seen with stratified squamous epithelia (n=5,
glans:urethra=2:1). Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest
preferential routes by which HIV-1 may enter the male genital tract in
female-to-male HIV sexual transmission.
Back to the Programme-at-a-Glance
|
|