 |
THPE626 - Poster Exhibition
Social network analysis of health care agency referrals to HIV/AIDS medical services in New York, 2007-2011
S. Kim1,2, V. Pinho1,3, K. McKinnon1,3
1Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, United States, 2Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, United States, 3New York State Psychiatric Institute, Washington Heights Community Service, New York, United States
Background: People with HIV/AIDS often need various medical services, and
few studies have investigated network structures of HIV-related care. In order
to address this gap, we examined referral practices of NYS healthcare agencies
to illustrate the extent to which geographic region and agency type were
related to collaboration between providers to deliver comprehensive care for
HIV patients. Methods: We collected needs assessment data by survey from 176 agencies
seeking HIV mental health training between August 2007 and October 2011. Mental
health, HIV, and primary care agencies throughout NYS reported up to 8 agencies
to which referrals for HIV services were made. Among them, 151 agencies
referred patients to 86 other agencies. Social network analysis was used to
determine the characteristics of referrals. Kruskal-Wallis test and exponential-family
random graph models were fitted to investigate statistical significance by
agency type and geographic location. Results: Designated AIDS Centers (DACs, i.e., state-certified, hospital-based
programs) accounted for only 30% of agencies to whom referrals were made,
though DACs provided 51% of all referrals. The remaining referrals were predominantly
to Community Based Organization/Community Based Clinic (CBO/CBCs). Geographic factors
(i.e. distance and region) were more salient than agency types to referral
networks. Different patterns among regions were observed in terms of the
distance between referral agencies and network centrality (see Figures). Conclusions: NYS is considered a highly specialized HIV-care environment,
and even outside of major metropolitan areas a high volume of patients requires
HIV care and collaboration. Disconnection between NYC metropolitan and other
cities and relatively low utilization of DACs might imply a) lack of
collaboration and of utilizing specialized care or b) well-established
collaborations and specialization within the local area care providers and
CBO/CBCs (not DACs). Further investigation would be appropriate to test these hypotheses.
Meanwhile, promotion of service integration through training, policy, and other
means of network-building is needed.
![[pic_01] 1. Distribution of Referral Distance](http://pag.aids2012.org/PAGMaterial/aids2012/abstracts_images/p_452_00065.jpg) [1. Distribution of Referral Distance]
![[pic_02] 2. HIV Referrals by Geographic Region](http://pag.aids2012.org/PAGMaterial/aids2012/abstracts_images/p_452_00066.jpg) [2. HIV Referrals by Geographic Region]
![[pic_03] 3. Centrality by Regions](http://pag.aids2012.org/PAGMaterial/aids2012/abstracts_images/p_452_00067.jpg) [3. Centrality by Regions]
Download the e-Poster
Back to the Programme-at-a-Glance
|
|